Men & Women

I read this on a Facebook page called Strange Art. I thought it was good so I’ll share it here…

strgart

Man is the most elevated of creatures, Woman the most sublime of ideals.
God made for man a throne; for woman an altar.
The throne exalts, the altar sanctifies.
Man is the brain, Woman, the heart.
The brain creates light, the heart, Love. Light engenders, Love resurrects.
Because of reason Man is strong, because of tears Woman is invincible.
Reason is convincing, tears moving.
Man is capable of all heroism, Woman of all martyrdom.
Heroism ennobles, martyrdom sublimates.
Man has supremacy, Woman, preference.
Supremacy is strength, preference is the right.
Man is a genius, Woman, an angel.
Genius is immeasurable, the angel undefinable.
The aspiration of man is supreme glory,
The aspiration of woman is extreme virtue.
Glory creates all that is great; virtue, all that is divine.
Man is a code, Woman a gospel.
A code corrects, the gospel perfects.
Man thinks, Woman dreams.
To think is to have a worm in the brain,
to dream is to have a halo on the brow.
Man is an ocean, Woman a lake.
The ocean has the adorning pearl, the lake, dazzling poetry.
Man is the flying eagle, Woman, the singing nightingale.
To fly is to conquer space. To sing is to conquer the Soul.
Man is a temple, Woman a shrine.
Before the temple we discover ourselves, before the shrine we kneel.
In short, man is found where earth finishes, woman where heaven begins.

See the original post here.

***

Three Ghost Stories (Brief Book Review)

ghost-stories

Bag of Bones by Stephen King

I think this is my second favourite King novel after The Shining. It is about a recently widowed writer, Mike Noonan, who decides to spend some time living at his lake house, named Sara Laughs, to cope with the loss of his wife and his writer’s block.

There’s a dark history at this lake village which involves Mike’s own ancestors, and the ghosts of that past begin to haunt Mike in his home. It is a simple, yet effective storyline. It reads smoothly, like most King’s novels do, and it does scare at times.

An excerpt…
The house had been aired out and didn’t smell a bit musty; instead of still, stale air, there was a faint and pleasing aroma of pine. I reached for the light inside the door, and then, somewhere in the blackness of the house, a child began to sob. My hand froze where it was and my flesh went cold. I didn’t panic, exactly, but all rational thought left my mind. It was a weeping, a child’s weeping, but I hadn’t a clue as to where it was coming from.
Then it began to fade. Not to grow softer but to fade, as if someone had picked that kid up and was carrying it away down some long corridor … not that any such corridor existed in Sara Laughs. Even the one running through the middle of the house, connecting the central section to the two wings, isn’t really long.
Fading… faded… almost gone.

I gave it 5/5 stars.

Check out more reviews of the book here.

 

Dark Matter by Michelle Paver

This book is about a group of British men who go up to the arctic to do some scientific research. The main character, Jack Miller, is a bit of an outsider and a loner. Three of the men make it onto the island, Gruhuken, to begin their work. When they arrive it is the last days of light, and soon the unending darkness will begin as the sun never rises in the winter up north. Jack is the communications man, and since the novel is set in the 1930s, that means morse code. As one of Jack’s companions gets sick, two of the three sail away from the island, and Jack is left alone for weeks in the darkness. He does, though, have a pack of Huskies to keep him company. There is a malevolent presence, a man, a murdered trapper, which begins to haunt Jack.

Jack has multiple opportunities to leave – his friends stay in communication with him via the wireless so he can always ask for help, another man who is staying on the other side of the island visits Jack and asks Jack to come home with him – but Jack always chooses to stay. He does not want to let his team-mates down, especially Gus, the team leader. And it’s this fact, I think, which makes the book very interesting. The story is not just a ghost story – it is a story about loneliness, darkness, and (less obviously) guilt and depravity.

An excerpt…
Two days since Bjørvik left. One since the dogs disappeared.
I walk bent over, as if there were a tumour in my gut. I miss the dogs. Without them, there’s nothing between me and what haunts this place.
It can come at any time. It can stay away for days, as it did when Bjørvik was here. But always I sense it waiting. That’s the worst of it. Not knowing when it will come. Only that it will.
A few years ago, I read a speech in the paper by the American president; he said, The only thing we have to fear is fear itself. He doesn’t know. He doesn’t know.
I’ve tried to pity the trapper of Gruhuken. He had a miserable life and a terrible death. But I can’t. All I feel is dread.
And knowing who he was doesn’t help me, because I can’t do anything to appease him. It doesn’t matter that I’m innocent. It isn’t only the guilty who suffer.
Besides, I am guilty. Because I’m here.

I gave it 5/5 stars.

Check out more reviews of the book here.

 

The Elementals by Michael McDowell

This is a creepy and strange book. The story is of two related families visiting their holiday homes after the death of the mother in one family. The homes are three houses in the middle of nowhere. The houses are identical but each faces a different direction. The middle house always remains empty, and is slowly being consumed by a sand dune. It’s also haunted.

I could not relate to the characters that well; they are too different from what I know in my own life. However, the interesting storyline makes up for that. The families have been coming to these homes for years, and one wonders why they keep going back. I was hoping for a better explanation as to why the third house is haunted — there was potential to connect the haunting to one of the families more strongly, but that never came about.

An excerpt…
“Child,” said Odessa. She stood out of the swing and turned her back on Luker and Dauphin, who were getting out of the car a dozen yards away. Odessa loomed before India, blocking sight of her father and uncle. “If anything happens at Beldame,” said Odessa, looking down at India sternly, “I want you to do something…”
“What?” said India, craning around to catch sight of her father. Odessa’s tone and her suggestion that something else might happen made her fearful.
“If anything happens,” Odessa said in a low voice, “eat my eyes…
“What?” demanded India in a hissing whisper. Her father and Dauphin were coming nearer. She longed for their protection. Odessa stepped closer to India, pressing her hands behind her to signal the two men to keep back. “What does that mean?” cried India desperately. “What do you–”
“If anything happens,” Odessa repeated slowly, nodding her head with terrible significance, “eat my eyes…

I gave it 4/5 stars.

Check out more reviews of the book here.

***

Big Fat Mama Canada

mama2
The debate about Bill C-16 with Dr. Jordan B. Peterson has got me thinking. Why would anyone living in a free society, freedom which men have fought and died for, want a big fat mama government to take care of them?

First, those who support Bill C-16 believe that they are on the side of love and compassion, and therefore have the moral high-ground. But, the not so obvious threat which they’re not seeing is that C-16 will give the government the authority to punish Canadian citizens for not talking a certain way. The gender issue is, more or less, just the issue which the threat has been attached to.

Second, why would anyone assume that those who oppose C-16 are automatically hateful towards the trans-gender community? Just because one might be against a particular solution to a problem does not mean that one doesn’t care about the problem. If someone says to me, “You should always give money to any homeless person who asks for it,” and I say that’s a bad idea; if the person then responds by saying, “You don’t care about homeless people,” then that person is ignorant, especially if I regularly volunteer at a homeless shelter and donate to the food bank — which are much better solutions to help homeless people. The same principle applies to C-16. If one is opposed to C-16, it doesn’t mean they are hateful toward the trans-community — it may just mean they care about free speech in Canada, and are unwilling to give that up.

And third, why do those who support C-16 believe that their only option is to run to big fat Mama Canada to solve their problems for them? Why don’t they get out there and do some awareness type work? Write up some literature to pass around. Make some Youtube videos. If they see someone mistreating a trans-gender, go and deal with the situation. But, it’s much easier to complain and let Mama Canada deal with it.

A free society requires adult citizens, not babies who always run to mommy.

12sim6

Click here to sign a petition opposing Bill C-16.

***

Eugen Rosenstock-Huessy Quotes #13

“A wounded heart does not recover in the spiritual world without a change in the visible world. Resurrection never does enthrone the spirit in the same place where it left one body, as though nothing had happened. Something has happened; death has intervened. When I experienced an infinitesimal fraction of resurrection, I learned to my amazement how severe the law was which made it impossible for me to continue among the same people in the same place.”

~from The Christian Future, page 145

Dr. Jordan B. Peterson ~ Bill C-16 Debate

img_2680

Watching this, it wasn’t much of a debate. It was two against one (three against one if you count the moderator). Dr. Peterson’s main argument is that it is never good to give the government the authority to punish people for not saying things a certain way. This is not so much an issue of what you can’t say; it’s an issue of what you must say, and Peterson rightly points out how dangerous that is for a free society.

Peterson’s opponents, Brenda Cossman and Mary Bryson, appeal mainly to kindness and an unquestioning obedience to the law. I’m quite sure that if this had been a debate about abortion, Brenda Cossman’s only argument would have been: “Abortion is legal. What’s the point in debating it?” She criticized Peterson for not knowing the law well enough. Well, you don’t have to be a lawyer to recognize bad law, and Peterson, who has studied totalitarian societies for years, does know how bad laws corrupt free society.

Hopefully Dr. Peterson doesn’t lose his job or his license to practice psychiatric care in the future. But if he does, will Canada still continue down this current path? Or, will someone throw a Trump brand monkey wrench into Canada’s PC machine?

Further reading on the debate:

If gender identity debate at U of T was about free speech, then the battle is truly lost
by Christie Blatchford

Intolerance Strangles Diversity
by Louis Kakoutis

Click here to sign a petition opposing Bill C-16

img_2821

***